Interpreting D4vd’s Birth Chart

I’ve been following this case closely, partly because my son and Celeste share the same exact birth date and year if I’m being completely honest.
That initial personal connection is what kept me engaged with this case longer than I typically would be. What continues to stand out to me is how incomplete and fragmented the public understanding still is of who he actually is as a person, at least from what is available.
If I did not know better, I would almost assume that with how calculated some of his preparations for fame appeared to be, he had people signing NDAs as far back as New York. Im just being facetious when I make that remark because obviously he was a child. It still is, at the same time, impossible to not notice how unusually controlled and silent everything surrounding him feels.
So much that it does look like he somehow anticipated that he would one day need that level of image protection, and long before any real spotlight was in question.
Since court proceedings have been pushed further out, the only publicly documented material being used as reference points by creators and reporters seems to be limited to the prosecution’s alleged timeline based on initial digital evidence, along with the medical examiner’s report that established cause of death and the autopsy findings.
Outside of that, what circulates is mostly Discord leaks and online threads where internet researchers continue piecing things together and speculating. There is still no single piece of evidence publicly available that, on its own, makes a conviction feel unavoidable at this stage.
Even with that lack of definitive clarity, I did not find myself losing interest in the case. If anything, it pushed my focus in an entirely different direction.
I’m sure it raises the question of why, outside of my son sharing a birth date with Celeste, I would care enough to go this far into understanding someone who has no direct connection to my life.
The reason I ended up doing a birth chart interpretation is simple. At this point in my 41 years of life, pattern recognition feels almost automatic. I notice inconsistencies. Disruptions. Moments where something no longer flows the way a situation normally should.
There are many disturbing details about this case as a whole, but the part that continues to stand out to me is the disbelief that someone his age, only a year and two days younger than my oldest daughter, could allegedly plot and execute something this severe against someone he spent a significant amount of time with, even if much of it existed online.
The alleged actions afterward regarding her remains almost reflect fragmented flashes of humanity surfacing in between performance and panic. Not remorse. I do not believe he suddenly viewed her as a person in those moments. I think she existed in his mind more as an object, a possession, something that relieved boredom and fed stimulation. But there are moments where reality likely interrupted the fantasy. Moments where it hit him that he could no longer just text her again, and with that realization came panic, procrastination, concealment, and increasingly irrational decisions.
The chainsaws. The burn cage. As gruesome as those details are, they also reflect disorganized thinking and impulsive escalation more than some calculated mastermind narrative. What stood out to me most was the sloppiness. Ordering items directly to the residence despite fully understanding digital footprints immediately raised questions for me. Either this was someone severely impaired, potentially abusing substances like MDMA or other party drugs while deeply sleep deprived, or someone else was involved entirely. Extended sleep deprivation alone can distort reality, heighten paranoia, impair judgment, and create increasingly reckless behavior. Add substances into that equation, and people stop processing risk the way they normally would.
But the contradiction is what keeps bothering me. This is someone who spent years online and built an identity through algorithms, virality, internet culture, and performance. Someone fully aware of how traceable digital behavior is. A VPN does not magically erase that reality. So ordering things directly to the residence under slightly altered names feels either unbelievably reckless or intentionally planted. Maybe there was outside involvement. Maybe someone else manipulated the situation. Maybe both dynamics existed simultaneously.
What stands out most to me is how little external perspective exists around someone who was essentially living online and only recently became culturally visible. Her family was nearby, she was actively being searched for, and yet there is this strange absence of consistent outside accounts that clarify who he was beneath the public persona.
The silence from people around him, friends, associates, and past connections creates a gap that is hard to reconcile with how digitally exposed his life appeared to be. It raises questions, not necessarily conclusions, about what dynamics were actually operating in that circle and why so few people have added clear, grounded context to the public narrative.
How I became familiar with behavior and deeper psychological profiling beyond the average person comes from my professional background in behavioral analysis, along with coursework completed while studying Criminal Justice Technology. Part of that education focused specifically on the psychological aspects of criminal behavior and criminal profiling.
During the final semester of one of those courses, we visited a Virginia state prison and sat down face to face with inmates serving 30 plus year sentences. Using the information collected during those interviews, we were required to complete a multilayered criminal and psychological profile of each individual as they would have appeared prior to arrest. It accounted for half of our final grade and honestly stayed with me long after the class ended.
So when I say I am professionally trained to read people, patterns, inconsistencies, and presentation shifts, I mean that quite literally. The investigative part of my brain gets activated when details stop aligning. I start noticing little notification dings internally when updates conflict with the original psychological impression I formed of someone. After enough of those moments stack up, I pay attention.
That is what happened here.
I did not initially care enough to deeply research him as a person. What caught my attention were the glitches. The inconsistencies. The details that psychologically did not flow together in a clean or expected way. This case, more than most I have looked at, completely disrupted the profiling algorithm in my head. People were off. I was off too.
What I actually wanted to understand was something more specific. Was this an extremely immature man child who spent years fabricating identities until one finally worked? Or was this someone desperate for an entirely different life, someone shaped by rejection after being pulled out of traditional schooling, who discovered that online spaces responded to him in ways the real world never had and then built on that relentlessly?
Down to the algorithm friendly name d4vd. Down to interviews where he openly said he planned to retire after five years. To me, this never fully felt rooted in artistry. A true artist can not simply shut creativity off like a switch. That statement sounded more like image management, discipline theater, and controlled exclusivity. It creates mystique. It makes limited access to feel intentional. Even the secretive fan circles like the “4 Heads” suddenly made far more psychological sense after looking at his chart and behavioral presentation through a different lens.
Even when he appeared to align with certain criminal archetypes on paper, emotionally detached offender, narcissistic presentation, identity fragmentation, manipulative persona construction, none of the textbook profiles fully fit. He mirrored aspects of three or four different archetypes simultaneously without fully locking into any of them.
That was the point where I stopped doom scrolling through tabs and commentary that led nowhere. I literally closed everything on my desktop, pulled out graph paper and my astrology reference books, and approached it from an entirely different lens. Most people in criminal justice or psychology would probably roll their eyes at that because astrology lacks scientific validation in those fields. I understand that argument completely.
But once I mapped out his astrological birth chart to examine relational and behavioral patterns as structured data rather than narrative interpretation.
I was honestly baffled by how much clearer the psychological structure became to me.
Before I get into the interpretation, I wanted to say, to those who consider Astrology data as Mystical I want to be clear that I do not treat Astrology as a scientific measure. I am using it as a symbolic pattern mapping tool I have applied in past case studies to better understand behavioral sequencing and relational dynamics.
The absolutely last thing I want to say before I break down his chart is very important and needs to be said. I noticed that I was blt first to do an interpretation of his chart even though my inspiration was ideally mine and wasnt fueled by seeing someone else do it, I also saw many of those same people doing a synastry (relationship) chart for the two of them. For those who are unfamiliar with what thar entails its simple to explsin. It tajee two birth charts lf the teo individuals, and overlaps them and then a 3rd chart is created fron the intersections. Yhis is a chart that interprets the relationship vs the one for the individual thats done from birthb want to be transparent about one decision I made. While I could have mapped a synastry chart between the two of them, I chose not to. I did look at her chart separately to get a sense of her general mannerisms, but framing what happened between them as a relationship is not something I can do comfortably. Mature as she was, she was still a child. That framing flattens something that should not be flattened.
Now let me show you what his chart actually says.

The Birth Chart Interpretation
Aries Sun in the 10th House
His entire identity was his public image. Aries suns at their worst are deeply narcissistic, and in the 10th, that ego is completely fused with fame and status. No audience = no self. Now remove the in person community and replace it with follower counts and streaming numbers. That fragile ego has no reality check. Ever. The internet becomes the only mirror, and it only reflects back what you want to see.
That retirement to an island after five years comment? Completely consistent. Aries Sun in the 10th is not driven by passion. It is driven by conquest. Once the peak is reached, there is nothing left to chase. The goal was never the music. The goal was the arrival.
Gemini Moon — The Compartmentalizer Goes Fully Online
Shadow Gemini Moon is already one of the most dissociative placements in the zodiac. Online interaction supercharges it. When you never have to be the same person in a physical space, the compartmentalization becomes total. Different personas for different platforms, different DMs, and different worlds that never collide. No body language, no accountability, no one who knows the full picture.
This placement was basically built for that environment and not in a good way. The homeschool pipeline removed every in person check that might have interrupted it. By the time he was interacting with anyone at scale, it was entirely through a screen where he could be whoever the moment required.
Venus in Taurus — Parasocial Possession
Shadow Taurus Venus already struggles to see people as autonomous. Online interaction makes this dramatically worse. You can curate exactly who you let in, control the dynamic completely, and never have to deal with someone as a full three-dimensional human. Fans become objects. Relationships become transactions you control entirely. The possessiveness has no friction to push back against it.
Mars in Aquarius — Detachment Without Consequence
This is the placement that online isolation really warps. Aquarius Mars is already emotionally detached in action. But when all your interactions are through a screen, that detachment gets normalized and then deepened. You never have to see the impact of what you do in real time. No facial expressions, no immediate consequences, no visceral human reaction to recalibrate against. The coldness just calcifies.
This is also the placement that explains the bewilderment when things collapse publicly. Aquarius Mars does not compute emotional consequences. The gap between his self-image and everyone else’s perception of what happened is likely never fully closed in his own mind.
Saturn in Cancer — No Real Home Base Ever Formed
Homeschooled, moved from Queens to Houston, primary community was online. Saturn in Cancer needs roots, needs a felt sense of belonging and emotional safety to develop healthy boundaries. He never got that. Instead, the home became the internet, which is boundaryless by design. Unhealed Saturn in Cancer without any stable physical community is a recipe for someone who genuinely never learned where they end and other people begin.
This is also where the rejection sensitivity lives. Saturn in Cancer wounds runs deep and quiet. They do not announce themselves. They just shape every single relational decision made afterward.
Case Specific: How Does This Chart Handle Being Exposed?
Aries Sun in the 10th absolutely cannot cope with public image collapse. This is someone whose entire sense of self is tied to how they are perceived. Being exposed as inauthentic or attached to scandal is not just embarrassing, it is an existential threat. Under less extreme circumstances the response is typically explosive denial, doubling down, or immediate rebranding. They do not quietly accept it.
But his Gemini Moon is equally relevant here. This placement genuinely does not always experience itself as fake. The compartmentalization is so complete that each version felt real in the moment. So exposure feels like a betrayal or an attack rather than accountability. “That wasn’t the real me” is a very Gemini Moon response.
Mars in Aquarius adds a layer of genuine bewilderment on top of that. There is an inability to understand why people are upset. The detachment means the gap between self image and public perception never fully computes.
Aries Sun will rage. Gemini Moon will rationalize. Mars in Aquarius will go cold. All three at once is a very specific kind of defensive spiral that creates serious emotional imbalance.
What’s on his mind as he sits in jail
Here is where it gets truly specific to this chart.
Aries Sun in the 10th house in jail is not experiencing obscurity. It is experiencing the most intense public attention of its life. And some part of that placement knows it.
The case is still being covered. His name is still being searched. Streams did not disappear. The algorithm did not forget him. In a deeply disturbing way this chart is getting exactly what it was always built to chase. Relevance. Eyes. People talking. He does not care what is being said as long as he is being discussed.
A lot of people have been comparing the prosecutor’s timeline against what he was doing online on certain days he was allegedly doing far more horrific things. The comments are full of people calling him a monster, unable to understand how cold he seems. How unaffected. How the Discord messages lined up against stream schedules and public appearances did not appear to register on his face or in his behavior the way anyone expected. People keep searching for the crack in the composure and not finding it.
This reads less as psychopathy and more as the deeply narcissistic architecture that is undeniably indicated across multiple placements in this chart.
Gemini Moon does not distinguish between good attention and bad attention. Attention is attention. The emotional processing system does not have that filter. The compartmentalization means the person who did what prosecutors are describing and the person performing for an audience are not the same person to him. They never were. They live in completely separate boxes that do not communicate with each other. He is not suppressing guilt. He is genuinely operating from a different compartment entirely. The switch flips and the other one simply does not exist in that moment.
He can dismiss accountability and genuinely believe that whatever happened during that other performance is not who he is right now. So he will be more confused as to why he is being assigned blame for something another version of him was alleged to have done. It sounds impossible. But that is exactly how this chart translates.
Mars in Aquarius is what makes that coldness possible at the execution level. This placement does not feel its way through actions. It moves, calculates, detaches. And when consequences arrive it genuinely struggles to connect them back to anything it recognizes as itself. The bewilderment is real. It is not performance.
Now add the Aries Sun in the 10th and understand what jail actually looks like for him right now. Has it hit him yet? Has being deprived of his one outlet forced him to sit with himself as a single entity and connect it all back? The performance should not need to continue without an audience. But in his mind he is still sailing. The world is still watching. The numbers are still moving. Every article, every thread, every video made about this case is feeding the exact placement that was always hungry for that. In his mind this is not a courtroom. This is a stage. The audience is bigger than it has ever been. The name recognition is global now in a way a five year indie career was never going to achieve.
Nothing about the crime he is accused of is taking up space in his mind right now. That compartment is closed. It may stay that way. What is open is the one that tracks relevance, attention, and reach. And by every metric that compartment recognizes, he is winning.
But There Was A Girl
This chart does not outwardly describe a crime. But it describes the architecture of a person who was capable of one. The placements were there from birth. The environment removed every guardrail that might have interrupted them. The internet rewarded every tendency that should have been checked. The fame amplified every hunger that should have been starved.
And in the middle of all of it there was a young girl who is no longer here.
A girl who was naturally slow to trust and who read consistency from another person over time as loyalty. His rise to fame gave her an avenue to finally access the life she had already been dreaming about. She was a child, and the things that come with being a child felt like they were holding her back, so she jumped in headfirst believing the version he presented to her would be there to catch her. She let her guard down. She opened herself up. She trusted him.
The moment she stopped resisting, he became bored. And once she saw him up close, rotating between identities in real time, she understood how mistaken she had been. That push and pull, come here go away energy. But every time she pulled back, the version of him that had originally made her feel safe would reappear, reinforcing just enough hope to keep her holding on. She excused the inconsistencies. She told herself he was just adjusting to fame. She had no way of knowing how deep it actually went.
She was not naive. She was not troubled. She was a child up against someone who had spent years perfecting how to be exactly who any given person needed him to be.
The day she threatened to expose him was her breaking point. She was angry and hurt, and she did not even fully intend to follow through. Once she calmed down, she apologized. And even if the version of him he sent to pacify her acted like it was forgotten, he never forgot. He never forgot.
That is the most chilling thing this chart has to say. Not what it reveals about him. But what it could not protect her from.
Nothing about this outcome is random. The map was there the whole time. We just did not know we needed to read it.







































































